Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Bush: "Vietnam offeres lessons for Iraq, we will succeed unless we quit"

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Bush: "Vietnam offeres lessons for Iraq, we will succeed unless we quit"

    Bush: Vietnam war offered lessons for Iraq
    By TERENCE HUNT, AP White House Correspondent

    President Bush said Friday the United States' unsuccessful war in Vietnam three decades ago offered lessons for the American-led struggle in Iraq. "We'll succeed unless we quit," Bush said shortly after arriving in this one-time war capital.

    Bush met here with Australian Prime Minister John Howard, one of America's strongest allies in Iraq, Vietnam and other conflicts. The president said there were lessons to be learned from the divisive Vietnam war — the longest conflict in U.S. history — as the United States wages the unpopular war in Iraq, now in its fourth year.

    "We tend to want there to be instant success in the world, and the task in Iraq is going to take awhile," the president said. He called the Iraq war a "great struggle" and said, "It's just going to take a long period of time for the ideology that is hopeful — and that is an ideology of freedom — to overcome an ideology of hate."

    In the years since the 1975 fall of the Washington-backed regime in Saigon, the United States and Vietnam have reconciled their war differences. Bush said he found it hopeful that countries can "move beyond past differences for the common good."

    As his motorcade moved through Hanoi, Bush passed Truc Bach lake, where then-Lt. Cmdr. John McCain, now a Republican senator from Arizona, was captured after parachuting from his damaged warplane. McCain spent more than five years as a prisoner during the Vietnam War, which claimed the lives of more than 58,000 Americans.

    The collision of past and present seemed to affect Bush.

    "Laura and I were talking about how amazing it is that we're here in Vietnam," the president said.

    "My first reaction is history has a long march and societies change and relationships can constantly be altered to the good," Bush said.

    Bush said that "the world that we live in today is one where they want things to happen immediately and it's hard work in Iraq."

    Bush said he assured Howard that "we will get the job done" and will stand with the embattled government of Iraqi Prime Minister Nouri al-Maliki.

    "We'll succeed unless we quit," Bush said. "The Maliki government is going to make it unless the coalition leaves before they have a chance to make it."

    Bush expressed appreciation for Australia's help and said he recognized there were questions about the U.S. role in Iraq and the deployment of about 144,000 American forces.

    Howard pledged that Australia would not abandon Iraq.

    "The idea of the coalition leaving in circumstances where the Iraqi people would not seem to be able to look after themselves and to enjoy the democracy they want would be a catastrophic defeat for our cause," the prime minister said.

    Less than two weeks after U.S. elections overturned Republican control of Congress and sent a clear message of disapproval about the war, Bush offered his own interpretation of the vote.

    "The elections mean the American people want to know if we have a plan for success. I assured John that any repositioning of troops — if that's what we choose to do — will be done with close consultation with John and his government. But I also assured him that we're not leaving until this job is done — until Iraq can govern, sustain and defend itself."

    A new Associated Press-Ipsos poll conducted after the election indicates that Americans' approval of Bush's handling of Iraq has dropped to just 31 percent — the lowest level ever.

    He brushed off suggestions that the United States might beef up its forces in Iraq and said, "I'm going to listen to our commanders. Ours is a conditions-based strategy."

    Vietnamese officials greeted Bush and his wife, Laura, at the airport on humid and hazy morning. Two young girls, wearing traditional white garments called ao dai that flowed with the breeze, presented each with a colorful bouquet of flowers.

    Interest in Bush's arrival seemed subdued compared with the massive, joyous crowds that stayed up late for President Clinton's unannounced midnight flight into Hanoi's international airport in 2000.

    Before attending a state dinner Friday evening, Bush was to drop by the headquarters of the Communist Party to talk with its general secretary.

    Bush came to Vietnam for a summit of Asia-Pacific leaders and individual meetings with a handful of leaders — all of them curious whether election setbacks had unsettled Bush.

    Bush will draw on his powers of personal diplomacy in meetings Saturday and Sunday with Russia's Vladimir Putin, China's Hu Jintao, Japan's Shinzo Abe and South Korea's Roh Moo-hyun. All are partners with the United States in talks aimed at persuading a defiant North Korea to abandon its nuclear weapons.

    Bush flew here from Singapore after warning North Korea against peddling its weapons and vowing the United States will not retreat into isolationism.

    Although Republicans lost control of Congress, Bush directly challenged newly empowered Democrats who are demanding a fresh course in Iraq and fearful that free-trade agreements could cost U.S. jobs.

    "We hear voices calling for us to retreat from the world and close our doors to these opportunities," the president said in a speech at the National University of Singapore. "These are the old temptations of isolationism and protectionism, and America must reject them."
    Does anyone else get this impression that just as you think he's gotten as loathsome as one can get, he can top it. This has to be one of the most retarded things he meant to have said.

    This logic means that he is willing to lose more the 60,000 plus Americans for this Iraq war...... no wonder we haven't pulled out yet, hell if he had his way we'd still be in Vietnam.

    This really boils me.

  • #2
    Vietnam

    Thorn
    THEY!!111 OMG WTF LOL LET DA NOMADS AND TEH S3D3NTARY PEOPLA BOTH MAEK BITER AXP3REINCES
    AND TEH GRAAT SINS OF THERE [DOCTRINAL] INOVATIONS BQU3ATH3D SMAL
    AND!!1!11!!! LOL JUST IN CAES A DISPUTANT CALS U 2 DISPUT3 ABOUT THEYRE CLAMES
    DO NOT THAN DISPUT3 ON THEM 3XCAPT BY WAY OF AN 3XTARNAL DISPUTA!!!!11!! WTF

    Comment


    • #3
      This logic means that he is willing to lose more the 60,000 plus Americans for this Iraq war...... no wonder we haven't pulled out yet, hell if he had his way we'd still be in Vietnam.
      Actually it doesn't. Even if you think the comment is stupid that interpretation is far more so.

      We tend to want there to be instant success in the world
      This however is absolute truth and is so for so many of the world's issures.
      "The DPRK is still in a state of war with the U.S. It's called a black out." - Che explaining why orbital nightime pictures of NK show few lights. Seriously.

      Comment


      • #4
        This however is absolute truth and is so for so many of the world's issures.
        My god he just slipped into a Bushism, is that like strategry, I smell neocon........

        Comment


        • #5
          I wish I could believe him (that we will succeed if we don't quit), but I just don't.

          -Arrian
          grog want tank...Grog Want Tank... GROG WANT TANK!

          The trick isn't to break some eggs to make an omelette, it's convincing the eggs to break themselves in order to aspire to omelettehood.

          Comment


          • #6
            I stopped reading the article after the part where bush says it will be a long struggle. I just got that weird vibe of listening to a Stalin or Hitler speech.

            It's all rubbish.
            signature not visible until patch comes out.

            Comment


            • #7
              We could stay 20 years and the facts on the ground are unlikely to change. Sunnis will still hate Shias while Kurds, Turkomen, and Assyrians will all hate Arabs. The only way to stop this is for one side to be so dominate that they kill or cow the other side the way Saddam did. Maybe once order is restored then with 40 years of enlightened dictatorship they might be able to slowly evolve into something better. It would take an iron hand like how Turkey's military has guided Turkey and I just don't seen an Ataturk coming out of Iraq.
              Try http://wordforge.net/index.php for discussion and debate.

              Comment


              • #8
                Wasn't Bush's initial plan for Iraq to be an instant success?


                As for Vietnam, that's ridiculous. All we could have done, if we stayed longer is kill more people and destroy more of the country at the cost of our own lives and resources. The problem with Vietnam was that we didn't leave soon enough.
                “As a lifelong member of the Columbia Business School community, I adhere to the principles of truth, integrity, and respect. I will not lie, cheat, steal, or tolerate those who do.”
                "Capitalism ho!"

                Comment


                • #9
                  Bush spent so much of his time hiding out in the National Guard that he missed the essential lessons of the Vietnamese War.

                  We quit in Vietnam because (1) we'd so alienated the people during a guerrilla war that we could never win; and (2) because everyday Americans recalculated and realized it's not worth tens of thousands of U.S. lives to prop up a corrupt and brutal regime overseas.

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    Let's make a deal with Iran:

                    We give them diplomatic recognition and South Iraq (lots of oil there!); they cooperate with us against the Sunni Al-Qaeda (far more dangerous than Iranian Mullahs) and recognize Israel. I think that's a pretty good deal for both sides at this point.

                    This will get them in direct confrontation with the Sunni Arabs, and divert attention from us. If Iran really wants regional domination, they wouldn't shy away from conflicts with the Arabs. (Arabs and Persians almost hate each other as much as Chinese and Japanese.) Our interests are much better served by watching the firework.

                    We will pull back to protect the Kurds and Kuwaitis instead, that would give us both oil and a foothold in the region.

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      Originally posted by DaShi
                      The problem with Vietnam was that we didn't leave soon enough.
                      The problem with Vietnam, AND Iraq, is that the United States got involved at all.

                      the US got involved in Vietnam because of the whole fear of communism, but really, the Vietnamese were just trying to realise independance from French colonial rule. There was nothing wrong with that back then.

                      The idea of overthrowing a dictator in Iraq and installing a nice peaceful rule in itself isn't a bad thing. But really, Hussein was the only thing keeping that region peaceful, so what is there to say about the region now?

                      US troops should probably stay there, but only to keep things from getting worse. There will need to be more troops though, which is unlikely given the current US political climate. So what is more likely is the gradual troop withdrawal Democrats will probably push for, which will only allow Iran to add to its growing influence.
                      Resident Filipina Lady Boy Expert.

                      Comment


                      • #12


                        If only Iraq was Vietnam, I would like to see U.S. Army out of Iraq.
                        bleh

                        Comment


                        • #13
                          Nice.
                          Someone should ask Bush where he gets the wisdom that the USA had won in Viietnam if they hadn´t pulled out of the war
                          Tamsin (Lost Girl): "I am the Harbinger of Death. I arrive on winds of blessed air. Air that you no longer deserve."
                          Tamsin (Lost Girl): "He has fallen in battle and I must take him to the Einherjar in Valhalla"

                          Comment


                          • #14
                            Originally posted by Ninot


                            The problem with Vietnam, AND Iraq, is that the United States got involved at all.
                            I agree. That's exactly how early we should have left, by not going in at all.


                            the US got involved in Vietnam because of the whole fear of communism, but really, the Vietnamese were just trying to realise independance from French colonial rule. There was nothing wrong with that back then.
                            It was a bit more than that. At least under Nixon, the plan was to turn Vietnam into a US colony. There was even talk of giving much of it to the Japanese.

                            Iraq may be bad. But Vietnam is still the darkest part of US international history thus far.
                            “As a lifelong member of the Columbia Business School community, I adhere to the principles of truth, integrity, and respect. I will not lie, cheat, steal, or tolerate those who do.”
                            "Capitalism ho!"

                            Comment


                            • #15
                              Is it Vietnam yet? Oh, wait...

                              Comment

                              Working...
                              X