AU601: sabrewolf vs. andydog

sabrewolf · July 8, 2004, 14:09

3300bc

Andydog · July 8, 2004, 15:42

3250 BC -->

sabrewolf · July 8, 2004, 17:15

3250bc

Andydog · July 9, 2004, 01:53

3200 BC -->

sabrewolf · July 9, 2004, 08:20

3200bc

Andydog · July 9, 2004, 16:05

3150 BC -->

sabrewolf · July 9, 2004, 16:45

3150bc

Andydog · July 9, 2004, 17:09

3100 -->

I'm going to have to spend some time reviewing the AU mod changes..

sabrewolf · July 9, 2004, 17:17

3100bc

i should too... i only remember some parts...

Andydog · July 9, 2004, 17:23

3050 BC -->

sabrewolf · July 9, 2004, 17:28

3050bc

Andydog · July 9, 2004, 17:37

1000 years nailed!

sabrewolf · July 9, 2004, 17:43

3000bc

Andydog · July 9, 2004, 17:47

and 2950 BC away.. night!

sabrewolf · July 9, 2004, 17:55

2950bc

Andydog · July 10, 2004, 02:51

2900 BC -->

sabrewolf · July 10, 2004, 08:54

2900bc

Andydog · July 10, 2004, 17:43

2850 BC -->

sabrewolf · July 10, 2004, 18:50

2850bc

Andydog · July 11, 2004, 02:19

2800 BC -->

I've just noticed I'm about last in this game. Bummer.

sabrewolf · July 11, 2004, 07:27

2800bc

AI always get ahead in the very early game, but we always catch up.

how's it going up your side? contacts? good hut poppings?

sabrewolf · July 11, 2004, 09:13

2750bc

Andydog · July 12, 2004, 04:33

not too good my side. No contacts yet, 2 goodie huts both popping barbs, one of which took out my warrior. Bummer!

2700 BC -->

How about you?

sabrewolf · July 12, 2004, 07:37

2710bc

slightly better: 1 contact, 1 goody hut, but 2 civil disorders because the city grew (and strangely, in my PBEMs, unhappiness kicks in as the city grows

)

but my neighbor isn't a very comfortable one. virtually untouchable early on (like the greeks).

Andydog · July 12, 2004, 07:45

yeah i've been caught out with the disorder occuring on the same turn as growth.

2670 BC -->

btw, are we going to stick with the AU601 preference of no attacking AI cities?

sabrewolf · July 12, 2004, 07:56

even though i much prefer WITH attacking, i think it's in the sence of this game to not attack.

but my vote goes for that what the majority of the other teams do (for the sake of comparison), which probably means no AI-city attacking.

what do you want?

sabrewolf · July 12, 2004, 11:53

2670bc

Andydog · July 12, 2004, 18:09

2650 BC -->

I don't care either way to be honest, but we might as well stick with the preferred format. Therefore no attacking AI civs it is.

sabrewolf · July 12, 2004, 18:27

2630bc

i have asked others in another thread. so far it's 1-1 on attacking or not. if the majority decide to attack, maybe we can rethink it ourselves...