Its stupid to post threads people aren't allowed to post to - I don't read long posts. What was it about?
The 150 post limit thread that we are not to post in...
hey ming! I almost did post in that thread because using the PC I'm on now only displays about a 3rd of what ming posted. I almost posted before reading the end of it. If you don't want anyone posting in it why not lock the thread?!? It's just asking for spam. Like peoples threads 'please don't respond to this thread'. you should have put the post warning at the top.
Its stupid to post threads people aren't allowed to post to - I don't read long posts. What was it about?
read it... just don't post in the thread you can't post in. for in you post in the no post thread you will post no more.
Methinks that you'd probably have earned more sympathy by mailing Ming privately rather than posting this thread.
Our email is all messed up (not sure if it's that virus or what).
<font size=1 face=Arial color=444444>[This message has been edited by My Wife Hates CIV (edited May 05, 2000).]</font>
I don't usually comment on these things, but it did seem odd to restrict that thread, especially since Ming said he would be bumping the thread. People posting to it acts as bumping and increases the probability that more people will read it.
I understand your POV on the subject MWHC.
But most people don't read the Site Announcements, and a thread is the only way to alert people. If I close the thread after starting it, it's a real pain to unclose it, bump it (to keep it near the top) and then close it again.
And, I will continue this practice whenever an announcement is made.
If people don't take the time to read the entire SINGLE post, WHY THE HELL ARE THEY BOTHERING TO RESPOND! Well, the answer is simple... spam. I did show some sympathy by only restricting them for a day. But I'm getting fed up with all the spam artists who post just to post... They sometimes don't even bother reading the thread, because they are too busy posting. Those types of posts by people is STILL THE NUMBER ONE complaint I get from people in e-mail and ICQ.
OK, I feel better now
------------------
Ming
CivII & Off-Topic Forum Moderator
Ming@Apolyton.net
<center><table width=80%><tr><td><font color=000080 face="Verdana" size=2><font size="1">quote:
<img src="/images/blue1.gif" width=100% height=1>
</font><font size=1>Originally posted by Ming on 05-05-2000 11:00 AM</font>
I understand your POV on the subject MWHC.
<img src="/images/blue1.gif" width=100% height=1></font></td></tr></table></center>
(typical Mingish brown nosing of MWHC)
<center><table width=80%><tr><td><font color=000080 face="Verdana" size=2><font size="1">quote:
<img src="/images/blue1.gif" width=100% height=1>
</font>If I close the thread after starting it, it's a real pain to unclose it, bump it (to keep it near the top) and then close it again.
<img src="/images/blue1.gif" width=100% height=1></font></td></tr></table></center>
cough, cough, lazy moderator, cough, cough
Ming. I suggest you sell off all firearms in your possesion and only keep a poker as weapon. that way, when you go mad and start on a killing run you will minimize the damage to the ones nearest... oh wait... can I speak to Mrs. Ming?
<center><table width=80%><tr><td><font color=000080 face="Verdana" size=2><font size="1">quote:
<img src="/images/blue1.gif" width=100% height=1>
</font>But most people don't read the Site Announcements, and a thread is the only way to alert people
<img src="/images/blue1.gif" width=100% height=1></font></td></tr></table></center>What?!? How can they miss that? The line to the top left of the OT is self explanatory I think, and impossible to overlook.
Btw, you didn't want anyone posting to the thread you started and look: now we have 2 threads on the subjectHmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm
They're poking fun at you, Ming. They're not posting despite your warnings, but because of your warnings. Fun and games.
Narck, as you may recall, the Nordics had a lot of trouble finding the mailbox a while back. Do you think the mailbox is within the intelligence range of the average OTer? Do you think these people actually clear their own mailboxes?
Yes DCA... that they are. So they deserve what they got for ignoring the warning. Their problem, not mine.
AH... lazy... yeah right. I have better things to do then clean up after you and people that spamand "(typical Mingish brown nosing of MWHC)"... no, just trying to be polite. Try it some time
Ya know Ming, just because threads aren't your taste doesn't give you the right to be abusive. You should moderate by the rules not to suit your tastes.
You are becoming a real cheap shot artist and abusing your position by it. Dropkick.
<font size=1 face=Arial color=444444>[This message has been edited by Alexander's Horse (edited May 05, 2000).]</font>
AH... I'll make you a deal then. You stop abusing me... and I'll do the same. Too many of your posts/threads include cheap shots at me. Don't I have the right to do the same to you?
The post you made to this thread is a classic example of what you have posting in many different threads.
So it's up to you. You keep up your harrasement, and I'll do the same. Fair is fair
<font size=1 face=Arial color=444444>[This message has been edited by Ming (edited May 05, 2000).]</font>
Hehe - yeah, but by giving them what they "deserve" you're proving yourself worthy of further abuse
And it's your problem, not theirs, because you see it as a problem and they don't
Life is complicated, non?
They break the rules, they go away for a while. No problem at all
And then they come back to break the rules again because it was so fun the last time
Dear Ming the Merciless,
May I suggest a short vacation? (-:
I humbly put before you an invitation to visit the not quite Twilight Zone where, while off duty, you can say and do what ever you feel with out the threat or shame of banning..
Remember how therapeutic it felt last time?
Ming,
thanks for the reply. It did seem odd that you'd make a thread that you didn't want anyone posting into, and not lock it. So unlocking a thread is a big pain? To bad you can't restrict the thread to only moderators posting in it.
Alexander's Horse, why do you pick on Ming so much? Is it your title/where you are from, or that you were Flash Gordon's Horse before you were Alexander's?
-Darkstar
<font size=1 face=Arial color=444444>[This message has been edited by Darkstarr (edited May 05, 2000).]</font>
Hmmm...do they get a reduction?
------------------
Comrade Dan: Apolyton Resident Communist.
Reichgeneral of the Anti-Demesos League.
Director of the Pokehate Corporation.
Apolytown Mayor.
Guy who wishes he could spam like Mao or Djugashvili.
(insert honorary title here)
comradedan@hotmail.com
ICQ#: 66881409
You talking to I.R?
I almost posted in there, as well....
Hmmph, if noone puts up a good God thread, I WILL post there :P (make it on personal identity, monism vs. dualism this time)
<center><table width=80%><tr><td><font color=000080 face="Verdana" size=2><font size="1">quote:
<img src="/images/blue1.gif" width=100% height=1>
</font><font size=1>Originally posted by Albert Speer on 05-05-2000 08:21 PM</font>
I almost posted in there, as well....
<img src="/images/blue1.gif" width=100% height=1></font></td></tr></table></center>
Yeah... until I read the warning...
ahh ****, you took too long.
MikeH asked me to post a link for y'all in here.
www.an.i-dentity.com/ubb/Forum6/HTML/006399.html
There you go Mike.
LOL! And I get criticized for being an anarchist... OFF WITH THEIR HEADS! LET THEM EAT CAKE!
<center><table width=80%><tr><td><font color=000080 face="Verdana" size=2><font size="1">quote:
<img src="/images/blue1.gif" width=100% height=1>
</font><font size=1>Originally posted by Atahualpa on 05-06-2000 10:16 AM</font>
Sorry Ming, this is really the first time I disagree with you. And yes i post here, despite the risk of being banned.
<img src="/images/blue1.gif" width=100% height=1></font></td></tr></table></center>I'm leaving the banning to Ming...
<center><table width=80%><tr><td><font color=000080 face="Verdana" size=2><font size="1">quote:
<img src="/images/blue1.gif" width=100% height=1>
</font>But I just find it ridiculous. I read the announcment others do that too. This thread serves no useless and I really advice you to unban those who you banned and delete this thread. I mean, there wont be a post so fast that reaches 150 and till that, everybody has noticed.
<img src="/images/blue1.gif" width=100% height=1></font></td></tr></table></center>in other occasions that there was no such threads, and we were saying "there was an announcement", some people were responding: "where? oh, that's announcement? I never check it"...
<center><table width=80%><tr><td><font color=000080 face="Verdana" size=2><font size="1">quote:
<img src="/images/blue1.gif" width=100% height=1>
</font>Please Ming, this banning really serves no one and this thread neither.
<img src="/images/blue1.gif" width=100% height=1></font></td></tr></table></center>I think these bannings are giving a vacation to the forum from people who like to play with the rules(instead of participate in discussions)
<center><table width=80%><tr><td><font color=000080 face="Verdana" size=2><font size="1">quote:
<img src="/images/blue1.gif" width=100% height=1>
</font>I mean a thread is there for open public discussion and not for announcement. Thats why there are announcments
<img src="/images/blue1.gif" width=100% height=1></font></td></tr></table></center>still, in other cases(votes, petitions, story threads, etc) there are specific rules for a specific thread. just so that the purpose of the thread is served better. why exactly do you or anyone else feel the need to disrupt that thread by breaking the simple rules set for that thread only?
<center><table width=80%><tr><td><font color=000080 face="Verdana" size=2><font size="1">quote:
<img src="/images/blue1.gif" width=100% height=1>
</font>Sorry, Ming, you may get angry, but I really disagree with your actions. Dont know, maybe you have just a bad day... Get some sleep. That helps!
<img src="/images/blue1.gif" width=100% height=1></font></td></tr></table></center>it would also help if you posted in the right place
as for those who said that there were 2 threads because of ming's thread, well there is now 1 thread only. in previous time we would 3-4 threads in the OT after an announcement...
<center><table width=80%><tr><td><font color=000080 face="Verdana" size=2><font size="1">quote:
<img src="/images/blue1.gif" width=100% height=1>
</font><font size=1>Originally posted by Cybershy</font>
MING, I really disagree with you here either. Banning for replying to a post really makes no sence !
<img src="/images/blue1.gif" width=100% height=1></font></td></tr></table></center>in other cases, Ming was making a thread to announce something, and ASKED that discussion about it be kept to the thread for that purpose, usually that being in the apolyton forum. STILL, people posted in the wrong thread. It seems people dont like REQUESTS and prefer BANNINGS
that's the whole point of Ming's decision
<center><table width=80%><tr><td><font color=000080 face="Verdana" size=2><font size="1">quote:
<img src="/images/blue1.gif" width=100% height=1>
</font>CyberShy, hoping that MING starts reasoning again, but is afraid he can't continue his great valuable discussions in his week vacation next week
<img src="/images/blue1.gif" width=100% height=1></font></td></tr></table></center>there was a thread to post your thoughts(this one) but you decided to do something else
YOUR choice
<font size=1 face=Arial color=444444>[This message has been edited by MarkG (edited May 06, 2000).]</font>
Posting Permissions
Bookmarks