View Poll Results: In combat a veteran Spearman should defeat a veteran Tank:

Voters
121. You may not vote on this poll
  • Never

    34 28.10%
  • More rarely than in the present Civ3 combat system

    15 12.40%
  • Very rarely, as per present Civ3 combat system

    45 37.19%
  • Always

    13 10.74%
  • I don't know, but the combat system sucks

    5 4.13%
  • Depends on the bananas

    9 7.44%
Page 2 of 3 FirstFirst 1 2 3 LastLast
Results 31 to 60 of 66

Thread: Spearman vs. Tank Probability

  1. #31
    Antrine
    Prince Antrine's Avatar
    Join Date
    14 May 2003
    Posts
    676
    Country
    This is Antrine's Country Flag
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
    Local Date
    May 25, 2013
    Local Time
    04:00
    Behold!! The story is most true, Arnold was caught unfettered ( unfortified) on open terrain ( Hollywood) and he miraculously defeated all those knights ( politicians). See the combact system depicts 'real life'....

    I voted to keep things as they are...
    The Graveyard Keeper
    Of Creation Forum
    If I can't answer you don't worry
    I'll send you elsewhere

  2. #32
    bvoncranium
    Warlord bvoncranium's Avatar
    Join Date
    01 Mar 2003
    Location
    The Nation's Capital
    Posts
    102
    Country
    This is bvoncranium's Country Flag
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
    Local Date
    May 24, 2013
    Local Time
    23:00
    Antrine made me laugh:
    Behold!! The story is most true, Arnold was caught unfettered ( unfortified) on open terrain ( Hollywood) and he miraculously defeated all those knights ( politicians). See the combact system depicts 'real life'....
    I voted to keep things as they are...
    I think that the Governator is more some kind of UU than Spearman!

  3. #33
    Sovereign
    Prince Sovereign's Avatar
    Join Date
    02 Jan 2001
    Location
    Boston, USA
    Posts
    819
    Country
    This is Sovereign's Country Flag
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
    Local Date
    May 24, 2013
    Local Time
    23:00
    Haha. Funny Ahnuld joke.


    IMHO, RoN had one of the best combat systems regarding the technological disparity between the civ’s units.

    However, I have a better combat model for a True Civ game. Here goes….


    Unit Base Hit Points:

    Ancient Age Units: 2 Hit Points

    Middle Age Units: 4 Hit Points

    Industrial Age Units: 7 Hit Points

    Modern Age Units: 10 Hit Points.

    So, say, an Elite Modern Age unit would have 15 Hit Points total while a regular Ancient Age unit would have 5 Hit Points total.


    Next area…. Firepower.

    Ancient Age Unit Firepower: 1 = 1 hit point damage per attack.

    Middle Age Unit Firepower: 1 = 1 hit point damage per attack.

    Industrial Age Unit Firepower: 2 = 2 hit point damage per attack.

    Modern Age Unit Firepower: 2 = 2 Hit points per attack.

    The exceptions to this rule are:

    3 Firepower units (3 hit point damage per attack) = Modern Armor, Radar artillery, AEGIS cruiser, cruise missiles, and Stealth bombers.

    4 Firepower units (4 hit point damage per attack) = Battleship


    Last area…. Odds calculation. Throw out the stupid Civ3 random generator.

    Attacker hitting Defender: Attacker’s AP divided by Defender’s DP modified by Fortify, Terrain bonuses, and city structures / size (if inside city).

    Defender’s chance to deflect incoming attack: Defender’s base DP divided by Attacker’s AP then the result divided by the Attacker’s Firepower.

    Defender’s chance to counterattack: Defender’s AP divided by Attacker’s DP modified by terrain or Fortification / Barrier bonuses (if Attacker is attacking from a fortress)

    Attacker’s chance to deflect defender’s attack: Attacker’s DP divided by Defender’s AP, then result divided by the Defender’s firepower.

    Note: When a successful Deflection is achieved, no damage is dealt to the unit doing the deflecting.


    An example:

    Marine: Attack 10, Defense 5
    Infantry: Attack 6, Defense 8

    Marine is located on a grassland tile.
    Infantry is fortified and located on a grassland tile.

    Marine attacks. Has 10 / 12 odds of hitting the Infantry. Infantry has 50% bonus to base defense from fortifying.

    Infantry tries to deflect the incoming attack. 4 / 10 odds. Attacker has 2 firepower, so 8/10 divided by 2 is 4/10, which will be the final result / odds.

    The Infantry tries to counterattack. 6 / 5 odds that it’ll succeed.

    The Marine tries to deflect. 5 / 6 initial odds of success. 5/6 divided by 2 (Defender’s firepower) = 5/12 then 5/12 is final odds of success.

    Then the cycle repeats until either the Attacker or Defender dies.

    Hopefully my models were clear enough for everyone to follow.


    What do you think?
    Geniuses are ordinary people bestowed with the gift to see beyond common everyday perceptions.

  4. #34
    bvoncranium
    Warlord bvoncranium's Avatar
    Join Date
    01 Mar 2003
    Location
    The Nation's Capital
    Posts
    102
    Country
    This is bvoncranium's Country Flag
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
    Local Date
    May 24, 2013
    Local Time
    23:00
    Sovereign asked:
    What do you think?
    I think that it would form the basis of a good combat system for some game. It would certainly be fun to try it out...
    However superior, it is substantially different from Civ's combat system, so there's no basis to evaluate it and/or discuss it further in this forum.

    excerpt from Sovereign's essay:
    Unit Base Hit Points:
    Ancient Age Units: 2 Hit Points Middle Age Units: 4 Hit Points
    Industrial Age Units: 7 Hit Points Modern Age Units: 10 Hit Points.
    I like this concept, in that it recognizes the general cumulative advantage of military advances (i.e. technology and training).
    I think that the weighting factors are too large (perhaps 0/1/3/5hp?); however the concept appears sound.

    Sovereign asserted:
    Last area…. Odds calculation. Throw out the stupid Civ3 random generator.
    It seems you have confused the setting of battle probabilities with the mechanics of the resolving each battle round (the latter depending on the RNG).
    Your proposal includes a method of setting odds, which has merit and probably deserves play-testing.
    There is also a lot of merit in the method that Civ uses to determine battle odds, namely that each round the attacker has a chance of hitting = (A/A+D), and the defender has a chance of hitting = (D/A+D). It has its quirks, but it has also proven itself pretty effective in Civ and numerous other games incorporating unit-vs-unit conflict.
    Whatever the odds determination method, a pseudo-random-number-generator (PRNG) will be needed to determine an outcome of any conflict based on those odds. Unless you can objectively prove that the PRNG is flawed, there's no reason to believe that any other PRNG will provide superior results.

    Trying to be constructive but also being picky - bvc

  5. #35
    Nubclear
    PolyCast Thread Necromancer Nubclear's Avatar
    Join Date
    08 Jul 2002
    Location
    We are all Asher now.
    Posts
    1,437
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
    Local Date
    May 25, 2013
    Local Time
    04:00
    RoN had one of the best combat systems regarding the technological disparity between the civ’s units.


    Isn't that ironic?

    Anyway, edited most of the units to make them stronger.
    For example, modern armour has around 36 attack now.

    I know, unbalanced, but I don't know how to make it balanced

  6. #36
    MrBaggins
    King MrBaggins's Avatar
    Join Date
    03 May 1999
    Posts
    1,528
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
    Local Date
    May 25, 2013
    Local Time
    04:00
    Originally posted by bvoncranium

    I think that it would form the basis of a good combat system for some game. It would certainly be fun to try it out...
    However superior, it is substantially different from Civ's combat system, so there's no basis to evaluate it and/or discuss it further in this forum.
    /me coughs... CTP & CTP2

  7. #37
    Sovereign
    Prince Sovereign's Avatar
    Join Date
    02 Jan 2001
    Location
    Boston, USA
    Posts
    819
    Country
    This is Sovereign's Country Flag
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
    Local Date
    May 24, 2013
    Local Time
    23:00
    Well, Bvoncranium...

    I was trying to establish a sound combat system. I just don't like the randomness of a warrior defeating 2 knights in a row without losing HP's.

    I hate that kind of randomness, so I desire to eliminate THAT quirky randomness.

    The odds in the Marine - Infantry battle I showed in my previous post... they have chances like the Lottery, but far less random or screwed up than the "warrior killing 2 knights without HP loss" stuff. I think.
    Geniuses are ordinary people bestowed with the gift to see beyond common everyday perceptions.

  8. #38
    bvoncranium
    Warlord bvoncranium's Avatar
    Join Date
    01 Mar 2003
    Location
    The Nation's Capital
    Posts
    102
    Country
    This is bvoncranium's Country Flag
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
    Local Date
    May 24, 2013
    Local Time
    23:00
    Sovereign explained:
    I was trying to establish a sound combat system.
    You may get satisfaction from sending your combat description to the developers/implementors of Civ's combat system:
    http://www.firaxis.com/contact_gamefeedback.cfm
    If it results in improvements to the incomprehensible battle outcomes problem, great.
    I've corresponded with Firaxes on game issues in the past and it has made a difference.
    - bvc

  9. #39
    Sovereign
    Prince Sovereign's Avatar
    Join Date
    02 Jan 2001
    Location
    Boston, USA
    Posts
    819
    Country
    This is Sovereign's Country Flag
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
    Local Date
    May 24, 2013
    Local Time
    23:00
    awesome! Thanks, Bvocranium!
    Geniuses are ordinary people bestowed with the gift to see beyond common everyday perceptions.

  10. #40
    Sovereign
    Prince Sovereign's Avatar
    Join Date
    02 Jan 2001
    Location
    Boston, USA
    Posts
    819
    Country
    This is Sovereign's Country Flag
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
    Local Date
    May 24, 2013
    Local Time
    23:00
    Sorry for double post!

    For some reason my T1 connection is sucking AGAIN!
    Last edited by Sovereign; February 6, 2004 at 15:54.
    Geniuses are ordinary people bestowed with the gift to see beyond common everyday perceptions.

  11. #41
    DrSpike
    Deity DrSpike's Avatar
    Join Date
    21 Sep 2001
    Location
    Enthusiastic member of Apolyton
    Posts
    30,360
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
    Local Date
    May 25, 2013
    Local Time
    05:00
    I voted very rarely.

  12. #42
    BulMaster
    Warlord BulMaster's Avatar
    Join Date
    30 Sep 2002
    Location
    In the middle of nowhere!
    Posts
    135
    Country
    This is BulMaster's Country Flag
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
    Local Date
    May 25, 2013
    Local Time
    05:00
    hmmm uuh hmmm all this sounds fun, but we do miss a point: How on earth can a tank atack a spearman? Seriously this thing is ILLOGICAL what they kept their spear guys on stasis aborad the enterprise? or in ancient history museum and were revived when the tank came! I don't mind when the spear dude kills my tank I laugh at it but what i get upset about is how they left that nonsence continune in the game!

    Still it is hillarious to see the tank explode by the punching of a spear

  13. #43
    bvoncranium
    Warlord bvoncranium's Avatar
    Join Date
    01 Mar 2003
    Location
    The Nation's Capital
    Posts
    102
    Country
    This is bvoncranium's Country Flag
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
    Local Date
    May 24, 2013
    Local Time
    23:00
    BulMaster made a good point:
    How on earth can a tank atack a spearman? Seriously this thing is ILLOGICAL
    It IS hard to picture.
    However, even in the real world the attacker has no control over what the defender chooses to defend with. I imagine that somewhere in the world there are tanks overrunning virtually-defenseless positions (and civilians), with similar odds.

    That said, I'll bet there are many Spearmen who read Apolyton, and would be willing to take their chances.

    I know that if tanks rolled into my neighbourhood, there's no way I'd wait for the army to defend my property (if you lived in Canada you'd appreciate why). Yes, I'd be in the basement looking for my ancient weapon faster than you can say "Honey did you sell my spear in the garage sale last summer?".

    Ah well... probably better to enjoy the game than let it drive you crazy. Cheers, bvc

  14. #44
    BulMaster
    Warlord BulMaster's Avatar
    Join Date
    30 Sep 2002
    Location
    In the middle of nowhere!
    Posts
    135
    Country
    This is BulMaster's Country Flag
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
    Local Date
    May 25, 2013
    Local Time
    05:00
    yeah true let the game go wild and we end in a psycho hospital

  15. #45
    bvoncranium
    Warlord bvoncranium's Avatar
    Join Date
    01 Mar 2003
    Location
    The Nation's Capital
    Posts
    102
    Country
    This is bvoncranium's Country Flag
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
    Local Date
    May 24, 2013
    Local Time
    23:00

    Democracy has spoken!

    Well after 83 votes and around 900 views the results are resoundingly decisive:
    About half of the voters want the combat system changed (or are just cranky), and the other half either like the combat system the way it is and/or like bananas.

    From this vote I'd conclude that:
    1) Firaxis/Atari won't do much to change the combat math
    2) They may have to put more bananas in the game, given the influential nature of that part of the vote.

    Your most humble pundit - bvc

  16. #46
    Aqualung71
    Emperor Aqualung71's Avatar
    Join Date
    21 Oct 2002
    Location
    Perth, Western Australia
    Posts
    7,544
    Country
    This is Aqualung71's Country Flag
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
    Local Date
    May 25, 2013
    Local Time
    14:00

    Re: Democracy has spoken!

    Originally posted by bvoncranium
    Well after 83 votes and around 900 views the results are resoundingly decisive:

    From this vote I'd conclude that:
    1) Firaxis/Atari won't do much to change the combat math
    2) They may have to put more bananas in the game, given the influential nature of that part of the vote.

    Your most humble pundit - bvc
    Although I'm not American, my conclusioin is a little different......

    Bananas = Ralph Nader

  17. #47
    Executor
    Warlord Executor's Avatar
    Join Date
    04 Jul 2001
    Location
    of Terra Prime, homeworld of the Terran Star Empire
    Posts
    179
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
    Local Date
    May 24, 2013
    Local Time
    23:00
    I just had a veteran battleship (unharmed at start) lose when attacking a veteran galleon. Makes me wish I still had my Civ2 CD. Why the hell did they remove those extra stats (firepower?) when creating Civ3?
    Humans are like cockroaches, no matter how hard you try, you can't exterminate them all!

  18. #48
    vmxa1
    Deity vmxa1's Avatar
    Join Date
    12 Nov 2001
    Location
    Oviedo, Fl
    Posts
    14,160
    Country
    This is vmxa1's Country Flag
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
    Local Date
    May 25, 2013
    Local Time
    00:00
    You can get Test Of Time. But seriously, I thought I would be able to post my modern armour losing to a spear from last night.
    It drop two hit points right away, but rallied back to defeat this uber spear. It is rather rare to fight a spear, but once in a while you find a civ that did not upgrade or was just isolated very early and allowed to hang on.
    It would have been very funny.

  19. #49
    LzPrst
    King LzPrst's Avatar
    Join Date
    08 Apr 2001
    Location
    John the Mad
    Posts
    2,462
    Country
    This is LzPrst's Country Flag
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
    Local Date
    May 25, 2013
    Local Time
    05:00
    hmmm uuh hmmm all this sounds fun, but we do miss a point: How on earth can a tank atack a spearman? Seriously this thing is ILLOGICAL what they kept their spear guys on stasis aborad the enterprise? or in ancient history museum and were revived when the tank came! I don't mind when the spear dude kills my tank I laugh at it but what i get upset about is how they left that nonsence continune in the game!


    read your history children. When italy invaded ethiopia they had a few tanks and the defenders (outside the capital where there were riflemen) were mostly spearmen. ACTUAL SPEARMEN! and they defeated the tanks from time to time. apparently there was a report by an italian soldier of ethiopian warriors running up to the side of a tank and ripping of the tracks with their bare hands...
    goooooo ethernopians! though the italians were never big on war after 200 AD
    Diplogamer formerly known as LzPrst

  20. #50
    vmxa1
    Deity vmxa1's Avatar
    Join Date
    12 Nov 2001
    Location
    Oviedo, Fl
    Posts
    14,160
    Country
    This is vmxa1's Country Flag
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
    Local Date
    May 25, 2013
    Local Time
    00:00
    Why read history as we have seen what update infantry can do with MA in IROQ, nothing.

  21. #51
    bvoncranium
    Warlord bvoncranium's Avatar
    Join Date
    01 Mar 2003
    Location
    The Nation's Capital
    Posts
    102
    Country
    This is bvoncranium's Country Flag
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
    Local Date
    May 24, 2013
    Local Time
    23:00
    Executor elocuted:
    I just had a veteran battleship (unharmed at start) lose when attacking a veteran galleon.
    Are you sure the galleon wasn't The Black Pearl? :-)

  22. #52
    Fatwreck
    Prince Fatwreck's Avatar
    Join Date
    09 Jun 2002
    Location
    Sweden
    Posts
    635
    Country
    This is Fatwreck's Country Flag
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
    Local Date
    May 25, 2013
    Local Time
    06:00
    I voted never, because now the AI actually upgrades its units so we don´t have to face the problem anymore!
    You saw what you wanted
    You took what you saw
    We know how you did it
    Your method equals wipe out

  23. #53
    Flip McWho
    Warlord
    Join Date
    27 May 2002
    Location
    New Zealand
    Posts
    266
    Country
    This is Flip McWho's Country Flag
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
    Local Date
    May 25, 2013
    Local Time
    16:00
    Unless your so far in front of your opponent that they don't have anything better.

  24. #54
    Fatwreck
    Prince Fatwreck's Avatar
    Join Date
    09 Jun 2002
    Location
    Sweden
    Posts
    635
    Country
    This is Fatwreck's Country Flag
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
    Local Date
    May 25, 2013
    Local Time
    06:00
    then you need to go up a difficulty level
    You saw what you wanted
    You took what you saw
    We know how you did it
    Your method equals wipe out

  25. #55
    Flip McWho
    Warlord
    Join Date
    27 May 2002
    Location
    New Zealand
    Posts
    266
    Country
    This is Flip McWho's Country Flag
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
    Local Date
    May 25, 2013
    Local Time
    16:00
    But it's easy where I'm at now

  26. #56
    bvoncranium
    Warlord bvoncranium's Avatar
    Join Date
    01 Mar 2003
    Location
    The Nation's Capital
    Posts
    102
    Country
    This is bvoncranium's Country Flag
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
    Local Date
    May 24, 2013
    Local Time
    23:00

    Skill-Testing Tank vs Spear Question

    Skill-testing question for you sharp math-types:

    If you compare the probability of the Tank winning in Case#1 and Case#2 below, does it have the same chance of winning? If not, which probability of winning is greater?

    Case#1: A veteran Tank on the Plains attacks an unfortified veteran Spearman on an adjacent Plains, with no improvements (town, radar, etc) or advantageous terrain (river) involved.
    Unit Attack = 16, Unit Defense = 2

    Case#2: A veteran Spear on the Plains attacks an unfortified veteran Tank on an adjacent Plains, with no improvements (town, radar, etc) or advantageous terrain (river) involved.
    Unit Attack = 1, Unit Defense = 8

    If needed, I'll post the correct answer in the coming week.
    Have fun - bvc

  27. #57
    vmxa1
    Deity vmxa1's Avatar
    Join Date
    12 Nov 2001
    Location
    Oviedo, Fl
    Posts
    14,160
    Country
    This is vmxa1's Country Flag
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
    Local Date
    May 25, 2013
    Local Time
    00:00
    Case 1 att wins 99.4$

    Case 2 att win .25%

    Not much difference.

  28. #58
    bvoncranium
    Warlord bvoncranium's Avatar
    Join Date
    01 Mar 2003
    Location
    The Nation's Capital
    Posts
    102
    Country
    This is bvoncranium's Country Flag
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
    Local Date
    May 24, 2013
    Local Time
    23:00
    Close vmxa1. Bonus points for replying first.
    There's a subtle variation that goes beyond plugging the stats into a combat probability program or utility though...
    BTW, more bonus points for anyone who can explain the differences between the outcomes for the two cases.
    - bvc

  29. #59
    Aqualung71
    Emperor Aqualung71's Avatar
    Join Date
    21 Oct 2002
    Location
    Perth, Western Australia
    Posts
    7,544
    Country
    This is Aqualung71's Country Flag
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
    Local Date
    May 25, 2013
    Local Time
    14:00
    Originally posted by bvoncranium

    BTW, more bonus points for anyone who can explain the differences between the outcomes for the two cases.
    - bvc
    • 10% defender bonus for plains - Defending Tank gets more bonus than defending Spear. So case 1 is 16 vs 2.2 and case 2 is 1 vs 8.8;
    • Tank has retreat ability of (I think) 67% for veteran.
    Last edited by Aqualung71; March 4, 2004 at 02:12.

  30. #60
    bvoncranium
    Warlord bvoncranium's Avatar
    Join Date
    01 Mar 2003
    Location
    The Nation's Capital
    Posts
    102
    Country
    This is bvoncranium's Country Flag
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
    Local Date
    May 24, 2013
    Local Time
    23:00
    Thriller's right:
    • 10% defender bonus for plains - Defending Tank gets more bonus than defending Spear. So case 1 is 16 vs 2.2 and case 2 is 1 vs 8.8;
    • Tank has retreat ability of (I think) 67% for veteran.
    It is the Tank's retreat probability that, strangely enough, reduces the probability of a win for the Spearman AND for the Tank.

    One way to describe it is:

    a) With no retreat, there are 8 possible outcomes for this battle in terms of hp for each unit, each with a certain probability. The sum of probabilities in this case line up with vmxa1's post.

    b) With retreat, there are 12 possible outcomes for the battle in terms of hp for each unit. In the 4 cases wherein the Spear has been lucky enough to take the Tank to 1 hp, the Tank has a good chance of withdrawing, which drastically reduces the Spear's real chance of victory. Also in the 4 cases wherein the Tank goes to 1 hp and retreats, it cuts off a number of it's own paths to victory, thereby reducing its total chance for victory.
    The net effect is that both units have a lower chance of victory than in the no-retreat case, with the difference taken up by the probability that no-one wins (4 retreat outcomes).

    If anyone is interested I can post the math at a later date.

    What's more pertinent is:
    1) The Tank's chance of winning is very high.
    2) The Tank's chance of surviving is even higher.
    3) The Tank's chance of losing is extremely small - if this happens to you, and there are no mitigating factors, you have no luck at all.

    Go get 'dem Spearfolk! - bvc

Page 2 of 3 FirstFirst 1 2 3 LastLast

Similar Threads

  1. Spearman vs Tank: A Different Perspective
    By Brutus66 in forum Civilization IV General
    Replies: 27
    Last Post: November 11, 2005, 16:10
  2. Solution to the spearman - tank problem?
    By spy14 in forum Civ3-General-Archive
    Replies: 99
    Last Post: March 11, 2004, 20:17
  3. the whole spearman tank thingy
    By WackenOpenAir in forum Civ3-General-Archive
    Replies: 41
    Last Post: January 28, 2004, 00:30
  4. A simple fix re Spearman vs. tank...
    By GeneralTacticus in forum Civ3-General-Archive
    Replies: 11
    Last Post: July 15, 2002, 13:58
  5. Still no solution to spearman vs tank problem.
    By Grrr in forum Civ3-General-Archive
    Replies: 110
    Last Post: April 27, 2002, 20:28

Visitors found this page by searching for:

spearman vs tank

spearman beats tank

powered by vBulletin 18 to 24 month funny halloween

who would win spearman tank

spearman probability

spearman vs. tank

civ 3 spearman

civ spearman vs tankspearman defeating a tank civ3 how to calculate combat oddsspearman tank civilizationciv iii spearmen destroys tankpowered by myBB 18 to 24 month funny halloweenciv3 spearmancivilization 3 spearmancivilization spearmen vs tankspearman v tank civ 3civ 4 spearman vs. tankcivilization 3 killer spearmancivilization 3 spearman tankciv iv spearmancivilization iv combat system probabilitycivilization 4 spearman vs tankspearman tankcivilization 5 spearman vs. tank

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions