The People v. Jamski - Case No. 2151-01

Mead · January 12, 2004, 22:49

Originally posted by Voltaire
In the case of the objection of the defendant the People?s Procurator does see merit. As such it would be best if Chairman Voltaire were not to act as prosecutor for the case, we humbly request that the court allow the prosecution time to find a suitable replacement.

We, THE PEOPLE'S SUPREME COURT (Magistrate Octavian, Magistrate Mead, and Magistrate Vander),

Will permit the People time to appoint a new Prosecutor.

The Court notes that the People should move swiftly to appoint a new Prosecutor.

If the People cannot appoint a new Prosecutor in a timely manner, the People may consider either continuing to have Voltaire as the People's Proseutor, or in the alternative, dismiss the charges against Jamski.

The Court expects a decision on the part of the People within 48 hours of this post.

THE PEOPLE'S SUPREME COURT

Jamski · January 13, 2004, 03:57

/me starts to get optimistic in Spam Prison *

-Jam

Snowflake · January 13, 2004, 13:13

/me is now very confused but decides to sit still until her name is called upon by the court.

Jamski · January 13, 2004, 17:26

/me tells HongHu to be quiet and maybe he'll get off again. *

-Jam

Mead · January 15, 2004, 09:06

I will be gone from ACDG for about one week.

I will be back late next week.

I hope that the People decide what they want to do with Jamski's case.

I would rather have the people appoint a prosecutor than the Court conduct an inquiry without one.

Mead

Vander · January 19, 2004, 16:48

It appears that this case is winding down a wee bit....

Jamski · January 19, 2004, 18:22

Does that mean that, as promised, I am free to go?

-Jam

Enigma_Nova · January 19, 2004, 20:43

I move for dismissal.

Voltaire · January 19, 2004, 22:06

Though I have no formal say in this, I think it best to dismiss the court for the time being seeing as it is stagnant. Though I think it best to not formally dismiss the charges, just in case you try something again in the future, these will count.

Enigma_Nova · January 19, 2004, 22:41

Done. Welcome back, Jamski.

Jamski · January 20, 2004, 03:01

YAY! Spam Prison will be my home no longer!

-Jam

Mead · January 22, 2004, 21:53

Originally posted by Voltaire
Though I have no formal say in this, I think it best to dismiss the court for the time being seeing as it is stagnant. Though I think it best to not formally dismiss the charges, just in case you try something again in the future, these will count.

We, THE PEOPLE'S SUPREME COURT (Magistrate Octavian, Magistrate Mead, and Magistrate Vander),

Enquire.

Comrade Voltaire,

We recognize you as representing the State.

Do you move to drop all charges against the Defendant?

Before you answer you should note that, because jepardy has attached, the Defendant cannot be later prosecuted for the actions that he was charged with if the Court grant's your motion to dismiss. Of course, he can be charged for new alleged acts.

Please post informing the Court of your's (the People's decision).

Please note that although the Court may be inclined to Grant a Motion Dismissing all Charges, it would like to give Hong Hu an oppurtunity to be heard (should Hong Hu seek it) before we did.

THE PEOPLE'S SUPREME COURT

Enigma_Nova · January 23, 2004, 11:44

Consider this an 'extra long recess'.

The charges aren't being dropped, they're just put on hold for a really long length of time.

Mead · January 23, 2004, 20:33

We, THE PEOPLE'S SUPREME COURT (Magistrate Octavian, Magistrate Mead, and Magistrate Vander),

Unanimously DISMISS all charges against one Defendant Comrade Jamski.

The State has been given ample opportunity to prosecute the Defendant, but, has chosen not to do so.

The Defendant's right to a Speedy Trial has been violated.

The Court considers it to be a grave injustice to continue this trial against the Defendant.

The Court Rules:

That the Defendant be released from any and all forms of restraint.

All freedoms and rights of the Defendant previously suspended as a result of these proceedings are Restored.

Court Costs and the Reasonable Attorney's fees of the Defendant are to be paid by the State.

IF THIS COURT DOES NOT HEAR A REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION WITHIN 48 HOURS OF THIS POST, THIS DECISION WILL BE FINAL.

The Court would consider reconsidering its decision only if very, very good cause is shown. From what this Court has seen to date, we suspect that the State will be unable to persuade us to reconsider.

THE PEOPLE'S SUPREME COURT

Enigma_Nova · January 24, 2004, 03:21

Jamski, the unrest that we have caused has saved your ass. Consider yourself thankful for chaos, and try to abuse it as much as possible.

Alright people, break it off. There's nothing to see here.