| Main Civ II Civ III CTP II SMAC RoN GalCiv MoO3 Alt.Civs Misc About | |||
![]() |
News | Archive Interviews The Column Newsletter | Radio Contests Forums Links | Chat |
||
|
| |||
| |||
|
THE COLUMN CIVILIZATION II VERSUS CTP2, TOT, ALPHA CENTAURI, ETC... By Hoek March 24, 2001 NOTE: This is The Column, a regular feature on Apolyton where anyone can write about anything to do with Civilization or the gaming industry as a whole. If you feel like writing, please visit the article submission page.
I realized the opportunities that existed to create your own scenarios. I started dabbling in scenario making, primarily just ones that I would play by myself. While I still played the game normally, I ended up spending lots of time making my own scenarios. Then, the Fantastic Worlds add-on came out, which really changed things for me. The scenario editors made it that much easier for me to make my own scenarios. The convenience and relative ease of scenario-making added so many layers of dimension to Civilization II that it had infinite replay value. I had also been becoming more and more involved in the Civ II community around that time. I started having lengthy discussions with people on the "Addicted to Civ II" forums and exchanged tons of ideas with people from around the world. The first scenario I made was a relatively unknown fantasy scenario called "Dragons." I linked up with a number of friends from "addicted to civ" to get some feedback. It was then that I realized the true phenomenon of Civ II. A whole community was built around the game, and I realized that probably the most important reason for that was the ability to manipulate the game. The hayday of Civilization II was probably around two years ago, when there were a huge amount of scenarios being made and collaborated on. It was that collaboration that made a community for me, too. It was great to be able to consult with great scenario makers (and friends) Jesus Balsinde and Allard Hofelt. It was great to hear feedback from friends like David Floyd, Xin Yu, and Enur. While each person would author their own scenarios, they were always the product of the community. Then, maybe a year and a half ago, a slew of new, modern civilization updates came along. They had better graphics, better gameplay, more dynamic diplomacy, and were generally better games than Civilization II. However, while the actual game play of these games may have been better, an important piece of the community was lost in these games. Creation is far too complicated with these games, and is too often not worth the effort. Civilization II gave creators tools to manipulate the game with a high degree of ease. While not actually programming a game, there was such a creative element to Civ II that it gave people a real voice in the game. It wasn't self-expression, but each scenario was somebody's hard work; each scenario was somebody's chance to create. That is what is lost in these new games, and I feel that the Civ II community has suffered as a result. We exchanged standard gameplay improvements for something more valuable: creation.
The opinions expressed on this page do not necessarily reflect those of Apolyton CS or GameStats. They are just the personal opinions of the writer.
|
|
Apolyton Civilization Site -- Copyright © Daniel Quick
All trademarks and trade names are the property of their respective owners. | |