 |
|  |
 |
|
Chieftain
|
Mar 2005 time: 18:57
| |
|
|
The main choice between longbows and MI for me is do I have iron. No iron = longbows.
Personally I prefer to use knights. More bang for your buck. x2 move rate is more useful more of the time in my opinion. Plus they upgrade to cavalry.
Lately I have started to use a combination of Knights and MI. I use knights to take cities and MI to garrison and quell resistance. MI can then be used to deal with any AI attempts to retake their lost territory.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Warlord
of Arkansas
|
Nov 2004 time: 18:57
| |
|
|
The cost difference between the two is pretty significant, but, then again, the retreat ability means that more of them survive. Also consider the terrain. If I have to slog through unroaded jungle to get to my enemies, then the double movement doesn't do me any good until I'm on their doorstep. OTOH, if there's lots of grass and plains between me and my enemy, the x2 movement rate gets me to the next target much, much faster.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Emperor
Perth, Western Australia
|
Oct 2002 time: 03:57
| |
|
|
Listen to the expert - vmxa1.
I concur. Knights kill MI and LB hands down, but are much more expensive! Still, in my experience (significant), they are worth the investment.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
King
Columbus, Ohio
|
Nov 2002 time: 13:57
| |
|
|
Knights are great but if your operating in bad terrain where the defender can entrech themselves then I use a MI or LB/pike or spear/trebouchet stack. Typically the stacks have about 10-15 attackers, 3-5 defennders , and 5 artillery.
|
|
|  |
All times are GMT. The time now is 18:57. Apolyton Time is 13:57. |
top of page
|
|
|
|
|
|