Comments/questions welcomed here.

For example a higher number of civs. If done right an increased number would add more depth and variety to the game.

But all changes that are far-reaching still could be done wrong. It all matters on the effort and time given to the developement of the game.

Actually there's a rule, well not a rule but you can see it happen, in the 3rd game you have to change it or it fails, be it reviews or sales most 3rd generation incarnations can't copy the 2nd or they fail somehow. You'll notice that many games are changing a lot but are going to be the same but the same at heart.

And most of the ideas here are just suggestions Firaxis can take them and change them so they can make Civ3 like Civ2 but better.

I'm still wondering why everyone gets so uppidy about this place I mean, don't you think Firaxis has a brain and will only use suggestions that don't **** up the Civ formula or make the game suck!??!??! Geez these guys, well what's left of 'em, made the last 2 games don't you trust them to use our ideas wisely in the 3rd. And we don't even know if they will use any of these ideas, well they probably will but hey you never know .

Bottom line, if I want to play Civ2, I'll play Civ2, I don't wanna spend 50 bucks to play Civ2 with some new graphics and AI, still the build a trillion cities and maul the guy tactics. I would rather go out and buy a better game, maybe MOO3 or Wolf3d 2 or WC3.

------------------
King Par4!!

fldmarshallpar4@icqmail.com

The "quality" of articles of this nature is completely subjective. What you see written are the author's opinions and feelings, and save spelling and grammatical corrections, we do not modify anything in the articles submitted to us in any fashion. Such actions would be inappropriate.

----------------
Dan; Apolyton CS

P.S. Shortly after the article in question was posted, we received another article submission which will go online next weekend.

It's not totally subjective. When you allow people to start calling poster here names --posters who at least have a passion for thinking about new possibilities -- then you create a hostile environment. I daresay that such an "opinion" stated this way under my moderation would have been locked or at least the poster would have been asked nicely to refrain from the names and make an intelligent argument.

But this was posted as an article!

It's one thing to state an opinion. Another to make witless attacks. Clearly there was a lack of any decent article, so you went with this one. Personally, I'd rather stare at a blank page then read a silly, half-page slur against some of the best people on this site. Even an article on how to clean stains out of the carpet would have done Apolyton more justice...

I mean, science and technology often slowly evolve from a step to the next. Often, that's the word.

Sometimes they simply leap lot higher.

Orville and Wilbur Wright, just for example.

I don't mean that they, as an Hollywood movie, did a magic work from nothing. Of course they studied, looked around carefully, tried and tested.

Tim Bromige has an idea of minor step evolution.
Some of us, with lot of silly and unrealistic proposal, studied, looked around, openly debate and propose to Firaxis a leap.

We don't care if you disagree with us. There are still planes on the sky.

Not a lot of hot ballons, anymore.

quote: Originally posted by yin26 on 07-16-2000 12:50 PM Hopefully this is some kind of inside joke, or I'm left to assume we don't care about the quality of articles anymore?

Yeah, I agree. I'm not sure who exactly he was referring to there, but I found it offensive anyway. And yes, Civ does have to change. Live with it, and get over it.

- MKL

"Famous video game designer, Sid Meier, and his studio design teams were killed today in a firebomb terrorist attack. Firaxis was located in Maryland(I think), and had just finished completing a game expected to sell over a million copies."

Seriously I don't expect any of the stuff I post to get in the game and I'm fine with that and I hope everyone else is too.

------------------
King Par4!!

fldmarshallpar4@icqmail.com

I think it is the polarization that was mentioned in another thread. Basically, I (and probably others) view Civ2 as being a unique game, albeit imperfect. Many of the suggestions seem to want to take away some of this uniqueness by moving it closer to other titles. There are those that want it to play like a wargame; or those to play like Imperialism; or those to play like CtP; or AoE or Pharaoh/C3, and so on. Civ2 entails a very particular scale and balance that makes it unique and ....

You know a
P-O-T-A-T-O-{E}

looking at Dan Quayle

------------------
King Par4!!

maybe you should make this kind of forum called My civilization on the OTHER segment.

each registered member will have his/her own thread and then you'll archive it all up . each new user will be given the opportunity to " write down " and discribe it . the short way or the long way will be his shot .

Dalgetti